Impairment Trends

---

In recent years, workplace impairment has become a pressing challenge for employers across industries. With drug test positivity rates reaching their highest level in two decades, organizations are considering proactive impairment management solutions.

Drug test positivity rates have steadily climbed since 2019, signaling a broader trend of substance use in professional and safety sensitive environments. Reports indicate that substance use is a factor in a significant percentage of on-the-job accidents, highlighting its severe consequences for both employees and employers. A recent National Safety Council survey in industries across construction, mining, and transportation revealed that a considerable portion of workers have observed fellow employees using cannabis during work hours, demonstrating the pervasiveness of impairment in these fields.

Impairment risk management is not just a matter of compliance—it’s a critical safety issue that often leads to increased accidents, legal liabilities, and productivity losses. Currently, enterprises primarily rely on supervisors to subjectively assess impairment, despite these managers having numerous other responsibilities throughout the workday. This approach not only diverts time from their core duties but also introduces the risk of bias and potential interpersonal conflicts. Research has shown disparities in workplace drug testing, with Black workers experiencing testing rates 15-20% higher than their Hispanic and White colleagues. Additionally, the National Safety Council (NSC), a U.S. organization dedicated to promoting health and safety with 55,000 member organizations, found that less than half (46%) of surveyed companies believed employees would feel comfortable informing their supervisors or colleagues if they were too impaired to work.

The NSC’s report based on an online survey of their member organizations found that nearly all (90%) were concerned about alcohol, illicit opioids, chronic stress and illicit prescription opioids in their workplaces, more than half (52%) said impairment was decreasing the safety of their workforce and a majority (77%) viewed impairment as an important consideration when determining an employee's fitness for duty.

Historically, drug tests were used to confirm that employees were not intoxicated during work hours. However, with the increasing legalization of medical and recreational cannabis, employers need alternative methods to assess real-time impairment while allowing employees to consume cannabis outside of work hours when it poses no risk. Because THC is fat-soluble, it can remain detectable in drug tests for weeks or even months after use, making traditional testing an unreliable measure of current intoxication.

Organizations can now implement AI-powered proactive strategies to mitigate impairment risks and create safer work environments. By leveraging impairment management technology, employers can use real-time monitoring and data-driven insights to help identify and address impairment before it leads to accidents. Ensuring compliance with workplace safety regulations and fostering a culture of accountability and well-being among employees are key to maintaining a safe and productive work environment. Investing in advanced impairment management solutions is no longer optional—it’s essential. Employers that take steps to address impairment risks will help create secure, compliant, and efficient workplaces for their teams.

The nuclear energy industry is at a critical juncture. AI is driving its resurgence, making it a crucial component of the next generation of energy infrastructure designed to support the growing power needs of data centers. It is projected that an additional 85-90 gigawatts (GW) of nuclear capacity will be required to accommodate the anticipated growth in data center power demand by 2030, compared to 2023. 

To address rising energy demand, Baltimore-based Constellation Energy plans to restart Pennsylvania’s Three Mile Island Unit 1 nuclear reactor, widely known for the 1979 partial meltdown. Professor Anna Erickson, a nuclear engineering expert from Georgia Tech, stresses the importance of rigorous safety measures and technological upgrades in the reopening process.

As one of the most regulated sectors in the world, it operates under stringent safety standards to ensure the protection of workers, the public, and the environment. However, recent statistics reveal a troubling trend: a 25% increase in the number of Significant Enforcement Actions (SEAs) issued for failure to comply with regulations. This rise in non-compliance underscores the need to address one of the most pervasive yet often overlooked risks in the industry—worker fatigue.  

Fatigue is a silent but significant threat to workplace safety. Across all industries, fatigue contributes to 13% of workplace injuries or accidents. In high-stakes environments like nuclear energy, the consequences of fatigue can be catastrophic. Research shows that fatigue is four times more likely to contribute to workplace impairment than substances like drugs or alcohol. In an industry where precision, focus, and adherence to protocols are paramount, the impact of fatigue cannot be ignored.  

The Unique Challenges of Fatigue in the Nuclear Industry  

The nuclear energy sector faces unique challenges that exacerbate the risk of fatigue. One of the most pressing issues is the demographic makeup of the workforce. Approximately one-third of nuclear industry workers are aged 55 and above. While experienced workers bring invaluable expertise, they may also be more susceptible to fatigue due to age-related factors such as slower recovery times.  

Additionally, the nature of work in the nuclear industry often involves long or irregular shifts, including night shifts and extended hours. Physically demanding labor, combined with the mental strain of maintaining constant vigilance, further increases the risk of fatigue. These factors create a perfect storm, where workers are more likely to experience impaired cognitive function, slower reaction times, and lapses in judgment—all of which can lead to accidents.  

The Link Between Fatigue and Enforcement Actions  

The 25% increase in Significant Enforcement Actions highlights the consequences of failing to address fatigue. When workers are fatigued, they are more likely to make errors, overlook critical steps in procedures, or fail to adhere to safety protocols. These mistakes can result in violations of regulatory requirements, leading to enforcement actions that not only damage a company’s reputation but also pose serious safety risks.  

Strategies to Mitigate Fatigue in the Nuclear Industry  

Addressing fatigue requires a proactive, multi-faceted approach. Here are some strategies that can help mitigate the risks:  

1. Implement Fatigue Risk Management Systems (FRMS):

An FRMS is a data-driven approach to identifying and managing fatigue-related risks. By analyzing work schedules, shift patterns, and incident reports, companies can identify high-risk areas and implement targeted interventions.  

2. Optimize Shift Schedules:  

Redesigning shift schedules to minimize long or irregular hours can significantly reduce fatigue. Strategies like limiting consecutive night shifts, providing adequate rest periods, and avoiding excessively long shifts can help workers stay alert and focused.  

3. Promote a Culture of Safety:

Encouraging open communication about fatigue and its impacts can empower workers to speak up when they feel too tired to perform their duties safely. Training programs that educate workers and supervisors about the signs of fatigue and its risks are also essential.  

4. Leverage Technology:

Monitoring systems such as voice-based fatigue detection can track workers’ fatigue levels non-invasively, providing early warnings when intervention is needed. These tools can be particularly useful in high-risk environments.  

5. Support Older Workers:

Given the aging workforce in the nuclear industry, tailored support for older workers is crucial. This could include ergonomic adjustments, flexible work arrangements, and health programs that address age-related fatigue factors.  

A Call to Action  

The rise in Significant Enforcement Actions is a wake-up call for the nuclear energy industry. Fatigue is not just a personal issue—it’s a systemic risk that demands immediate attention. By prioritizing fatigue management, companies can enhance safety, improve compliance, and protect their most valuable asset: their workforce.  

As the industry continues to evolve, addressing fatigue must be a cornerstone of any safety strategy. After all, in an environment where the stakes are so high, there’s no room for error—and no excuse for inaction.  

The mining industry is one of the most physically demanding and high-risk sectors in the world. Workers operate heavy machinery, handle explosives, and navigate challenging environments, often in remote locations. In such a setting, impairment—whether due to fatigue, substances, or other factors—can have devastating consequences. Recent statistics highlight the scale of the issue: 17% of miners and 16.5% of construction workers report heavy drinking in the past month, while 5% of miners and 11.6% of construction workers admit to recent drug use. Even more concerning, 54% of workers report seeing coworkers sharing cannabis during work hours (National Safety Council). These figures highlight the urgent need to tackle impairment as a critical risk management challenge, especially after the industry's deadliest year in a decade in 2023, when 40 miners lost their lives in accidents across the U.S.

Impairment in mining not only jeopardizes the safety of individual workers but also poses significant risks to entire operations. Fatigue, substance use, stress, and environmental factors can all contribute to impaired performance, leading to accidents, equipment damage, production losses, and regulatory penalties. Impairment poses significant risk during all the steps of day-to-day operations including extraction, transportation and processing. Operators of heavy machinery and haul trucks are at high risk of impairment due to shift-induced fatigue and monotonous work where situational awareness decreases significantly. According to Caterpillar, 65% of truck haulage accidents are directly related to drivers feeling tired or exhausted.  

The impact of impairment extends beyond immediate safety risks. Equipment damage caused by impaired workers can result in costly repairs and production delays. Regulatory violations can lead to fines, legal liabilities, and damage to a company’s reputation. Moreover, a culture that tolerates impairment can erode team morale and make it harder to attract and retain skilled workers.  

Addressing impairment requires a proactive, multi-faceted approach. Companies should implement comprehensive fatigue management programs, enforce strict substance use policies, and promote mental health and well-being. Leveraging technology, such as voice-based impairment screening, can also help identify and mitigate risks. Regular training and safety drills are essential to ensure workers are aware of the risks and know how to respond in emergencies.  

Ultimately, fostering a culture of safety and accountability is key to reducing impairment in mining. By prioritizing worker well-being and implementing robust risk management strategies, the industry can enhance safety, improve compliance, and ensure the long-term sustainability of operations.  

The stakes in mining are too high to ignore the risks of impairment. After all, in an industry where precision and focus are paramount, there’s no room for compromise when it comes to safety.